Skip to main content

Motorola Moto E review

The Motorola Moto G has been such a huge success since its launch in 2013 (it's Motorola's best-selling smartphone of all time) that the company has decided to follow it up with another low-cost handset, the Moto E. Continue reading for our Moto E review.
Unusually for a new smartphone, we're not talking about bigger screens, faster processors or more megapixels with the Moto E. The headline is the price, which at £90 unlocked makes this one of the cheapest smartphones we've ever reviewed.
Motorola Moto E review

Motorola Moto E review: screen

At such a low price, the Moto E inevitably makes some compromises. Its 4.3in display is notably smaller than that of the Moto G, and the 540 x 960 resolution gives a lower pixel density of 256ppi. However, image quality, which was a major strength of the Moto G, remains very strong.
To the eye, despite an ever-so-slightly more pixellated look than the Moto G, images and graphics appear both punchy and bright. We measured peak brightness hitting 408cd/m2 and contrast reaching 1,133:1; those are figures that pretty much match its larger sibling. It's an excellent display.

Motorola Moto E review: core specifications and performance

At this price we didn't expect the most powerful CPU, and indeed the Moto E offers a distinctly middle-of-the-road specification. It has a dual-core 1.2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 processor, 1GB of RAM and an Adreno 302 GPU, with only 4GB of onboard storage for apps, videos and pictures. One odd limitation is there's no onboard compass, which is a shame, since when walking it's often useful to know the direction you're facing.
The phone feels mostly snappy and responsive, but benchmark results reveal that it's far from the fastest phone on the block, with a SunSpider time of 1,643ms, and Geekbench single- and multicore results of 320 and 601 respectively. This puts it a little behind the Moto G, which wasn't exactly a rocket ship itself.
Give the phone something demanding to do, and further weaknesses surface. Panning and zooming around in Google Maps isn't the smoothest experience, and in the GFXBench T-Rex HD benchmark, a frame rate of 10.7fps indicates the Moto E will have trouble with intensive 3D games. Bejewelled fans will be perfectly happy; Asphalt 8 aficionados less so.
Motorola Moto E review

Motorola Moto E review: camera

The Motorola Moto G's biggest weakness was its camera, and the Moto E's 5-megapixel snapper, alas, is no better. After spending a few days photographing everything in sight, we were far from satisified with the results.
The big problem is that the Moto E's camera is fixed-focus, so it's hopeless at capturing crisp, close-up subjects. When we did manage to take a sharp picture, the Moto E's white balance and metering often got things badly wrong, and every image we snapped looked smeary and over-compressed.
Motorola Moto E review: camera quality
We were even less impressed with the phone's video capabilities. With resolution limited to 854 x 480, footage lacks detail, and the phone does a terrible job at adjusting exposure and white balance on the fly. Move from dark scenes to lighter ones and you can see the camera visibly stepping from one exposure level to the next.
Suffice it to say, the Moto E's camera is good for the occasional snap, but little more, and the camera app itself is sluggish and unresponsive, making it a chore to take photos.

Motorola Moto E review: calling and audio

A further area of weakness is audio quality. Although call quality is fine via the earpiece, microphone and headset jack, and volume is perfectly acceptable, we're less than impressed with the Moto E's speaker.
Motorola Moto E review: speaker
At medium volume and up, the front-facing speaker beneath the screen is afflicted by an annoying, rustling distortion. It's there all the time, whether you're playing music, watching a film or talking to someone on speakerphone.

Motorola Moto E review: battery life

The Moto E's battery life is impressive, and Motorola's claim that the phone will last a full day of use turns out to be well founded. Throughout our intensive testing, it lasted the full course of every day, often with plenty of capacity remaining.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Top Windows Smartphones Apps

Apps 120 My Top Windows Phone Photography Apps Windows Phone Central App Roundup: Photography Apps While it may be a coin toss as to which genre of apps, weather or photo, are more numerous in the Windows Phone Store there is little doubt that we are fortunate to have plenty of quality choices with both. I have got several photography apps installed on my Windows Phone and this week's roundup is going to focus on some of my favorite photo editors. These are photo apps that I have found helpful for quick fixes of photos as well as apps that can add a creative flair to images. Now before you pass out the pitch forks and torches, there are plenty of photo apps out there that are solid Windows Phone apps such as Fhotoroom , Nokia's Creative Studio , , ProShot , Phototastic and even Fantasia Painter . While these are all quality apps, the apps in this week's roundup are ones that I currently find myself using w

Sony Xperia Z3 Compact

Sony Xperia Z3 Compact – Review Iterative products are just a way of life these days. We get a new slightly updated device every few months, sometimes every six months, sometimes even every year, Sony have mastered the iterative product cycle, releasing new products every six months ensuring they stay current. A manufacturer finds a new niche or use case and sometimes it’s a hit with the consumer, the Sony Z1 Compact was one such phone, for a while to buy a small compact Android device meant you’d have to compromise on specs, build quality and design. A few companies had tried something different but none had really made a success with them. Sony last year decided to offer a high spec device in a small chassis that would appeal to those people who wanted the latest flagship spec and high performance, but didn’t want a huge great 5″+ device that needed two hands to operate. This year they’ve gone

LG G3 vs Samsung Galaxy S5

LG G3 vs Samsung Galaxy S5 Introduction Inside and outside, the LG G3 is nothing short of a truly impressive, and quite intriguing, device. In fact, it's the first device to claim that it's both global and has an extremely detailed, 1440 x 2560 (QHD) resolution display. And that's not even half of it – the hardware configuration of the phone is just monstrous. But so is the one on the Galaxy S5 . The latest Samsung juggernaut has reaped major success with both consumers and critics alike, and that's not surprising in the least. So while the S5 display's pixel count falls short of that on the G3, the phone certainly has a ton to offer, including (but not limited to) an outstanding, 16-megapixel camera, a dust- and water-resistant body, and a vast array of software features. Today, in an attempt to at least partially defuse this seeming stalemate, we'll explore the depths of either phones, jotting down scores all